Having finished Kafka's The Metamorphosis once again, I find that familiar, uncomfortable feeling about just what to make of it. I enjoy Kafka for his unequaled mélange of stark reality mixed with a tinge of the allegorical, metaphysical, and supernatural. His writing cannot be classified accurately as magical realism, but it has the same -- if not more intense -- disarming characteristics that elicit confusion, as if the Twilight Zone has ruptured mundanity and is treated as just another aspect of that normal, everyday life. Not quite a tale of the supernatural, nor a unified allegory, nor a tale of the quotidian, nor a journey through the psychology of the characters, The Metamorphosis, like most of Kafka's other writings, cannot be interpreted in a new critical manner. We must be comfortable with our discomfort, with our inability to neatly tie this piece up in one pretty bow.
Like Ovid's Metamorphoses, Kafka's novella seems to deal with the capricious desires of its characters. Yet, while privy to the minds of the gods' in Ovid, we get no such honor in Kafka's work -- in fact just the opposite. While Ovid's work provides reasons why bad things happen to people, Kafka's shrugs its shoulders as the seemingly quixotic vicissitudes of nature as if to say, yes, weird shit happens, but you'll never know why, and you'll just have to deal with it. This is just the situation that Gregor Samsa finds himself in when he wakes up to find he has been "transformed into a monstrous vermin." Take that!
Rather than asking the obvious question -- how did this happen? -- Gragor instead on the aspects of his life that had held order and comfort for him up until this point: the framed picture of the woman, his job and how he will disappoint the authority figures, and the weather. It would seem that these considerations would be secondary considering his recent metamorphosis; however, they continue to occupy the forefront of Gregor's concern. The only distractions from these thoughts are when he tries to move as he is used to, but his new body gets in the way. He cannot move but awkwardly, nor can he speak but through hisses, squeals that sound like an animal's. The authority that had directly Gregor's life up until this point has no influence on his current situation. This change is a disruption with no apparent cause, only the current reality of that change holds significance, as the news of bad weather or a boss' admonishment.
One important theme that runs throughout The Metamorphosis concerns the shifting influence of authority and power. Up until his change, Gregor had been the sole provider for his mother, father, and sister. His job as a traveling salesman not only supported their daily needs, but also worked toward freeing his parents from some undisclosed debt to Gregor's current boss. While we might be sympathetic toward Gregor for his ostensible good will, hints that his actions do not free, but imprison begin to become apparent. For instance, his father had not worked for five years, and during that time he had "grown very fat, [and become] very clumsy." His mother, too, had developed asthma and found it difficult to even walk through the apartment. They sit around the apartment all day, while Gregor works to feed them. At first glance, it might seem that Gregor is fulfilling his filial obligations by providing for his infirm parents; however, after Gregor's metamorphosis, the father gets a job and becomes a new man in his appearance and demeanor, so much so that Gregor does not recognize him. It seems that Gregor's sense of duty has inadvertently been the cause of the father's decline. When forced to work for himself, he even regains his name: instead of "the father," he has become, once again, "Mr. Samsa" carrying with it all the weight and authority of a patriarch. Similar metamorphoses happen to the mother (later "Mrs. Samsa") and Grete. Even Gregor's intention to send Grete to the conservatory to study music, without consulting her or his parents about their desires, speaks of his control over them, making them virtual prisoners to their philanthropic jailer.
When Gregor finally dies, the end of the novella is bright for the new Samsa family. They seem to have regained their sense of self-worth in their new-found independence. While certainly we are meant to identify with Gregor, we can't help but notice the sunlight outside the apartment for the first time in the story. Like a family caring for a dying member, there is sadness, but also a sense of relief when the sick person finally passes.
This story, however, is not The Death of Gregor Samsa because of the sheer lack of human psychological considerations about life and death. Throughout the story, Gregor becomes increasingly an animal, and less human, perhaps providing a figurative meaning for his metamorphosis: he always was a cockroach. Indeed, his room begins to stink, so much so, that Grete needs to run and open a window before she can begin tidying up. As Gregor gets used to his new body, he seems to begin reveling in its concomitant abilities: the speed of his stick-like legs, his ability to creep over the walls and ceilings, and his penchant for hiding in corners and under the couches. His sister seems to understand that Gregor would be more happy if she removed the furniture that obstructed his crawling freedom, and he seems all for it. Yet, as the mother points out, this furniture is all that they have left of the human Gregor: if it were to be removed, perhaps his chances for ever returning would be decreased. At that consideration, Gregor begins to cling to his waning humanity, causing him only more pain, like a dying man clinging to a life that is inevitably ebbing.
Yet, Kafka seems to want the reader to sympathize with Gregor, not hold him in contempt or horror. Gregor becomes increasingly alienated, but is able to eavesdrop on his family's conversations, watch them through the cracks in the door, and continue to long for the times when he could play an active role in their lives, rather than constant burden. In an effort to guard the photograph he cut from a magazine and saved -- perhaps a pathetic symbol of an equally pathetic life -- he "escapes" his room, frightens the mother and his sister, and has to be punished by the father, who fatally wounds him with an apple, itself perhaps recalling the apple from Genesis caused the fall of humans.
Gregor's last effort to regain a connection with his family comes when he is drawn to the music from his sister's violin. Like a beast drawn to the hypnotizing allure of music, Gregor approaches, insulting the boarders, frightening the mother, and enraging the father. He imagines his sister living with him in his room, playing to make him happy, while he guarded he by "hissing at attackers" -- "He wanted to keep her there and never let her out, at least not in his lifetime." This sentence is perhaps a synecdoche of the theme of imprisonment and Gregor's power over them all. His success, his advice, his declarations -- everything that he believed allowed his family to live a "quiet life . . . all prosperity, all contentment" -- were only shackles to keep them under his control.
While all this sounds sinister, the true irony is that Gregor never even knew that he was his family's jailer, not their emancipator. Kafka only hints at this -- like Gregor's room being in the center of the house, the fuss his whole family makes when he misses his train at the beginning -- but the end shows their "future prospects . . . were anything but bad."
I guess the true difficulty with this novella is the unanswered question about how to live. Surely Gregor believed that he was playing the role of the good son and brother, yet it's just this role that imprisons both him and his family. As always, Kafka is reticent about providing answers, much like at the end of his famous parable "Before the Law." How do we make decisions in the midst of an order we do not and cannot understand? The scary thing about Kafka's vision of the universe is that it is ordered, perhaps much like Ovid's, yet the caprices of the gods can never be known to us.
15 July 2004
On Kafka's Metamorphosis
Posted by
GRLucas
at
Thursday, July 15, 2004
Labels: kafka, metamorphosis
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
Gregor is not a cochroach but, according to Vladimir Nabokov, he is something else. The fact that he is impossible to picture, except when Kafka gives us the instances of his appearence, gives the reader a poignant new aspect of Gregors embodiment. I think that this is very important to note.
I think that you also have to note the abyss within life that is revealed. You recognize the irony of Gregor as the oppressor, but you do not notice the repressed Gregor. Kafka's existentialism is very evident in the story as he laments for the individual. This is exemplified in Gregors aspirations for the future , as he is also trying to escape the imprisonment of his family duties, and of the society. The insect is a symbol of a persons arduous struggle for individuality where he becomes exactly an insect, a meaningless creature tormented by his acute consciousness.
Indeed, I did not discuss Gregor's oppression/repression just because that reading seems so de rigeur. However, I'm not so sure that he's trying to escape from his duty, as this is what seems to define his life. Yes, here is hope for something better -- perhaps exemplified by the pin-up -- but he his content playing his role until he cannot play that role anymore, something he shares with Tolstoy's Ivan Ilyitch. Existentially, they do not begin examining their lives (and this is still questionable in Gregor's case) until that life begins to ebb. Or, are you suggesting that his metamorphosis into an insect -- that "something else" -- is a metaphor for Gregor's beginning to consider his life? Interesting... This is what I love about Kafka: no one interpretation can ever be all. New Critics must hate him.
One very minor observation: think of the pinup, a woman almost all in fur. (I forget the name of the c. 1900 German artist who loved to paint these figures, cuties wrapping themselves in fur, but you always see them in the auction catalogs for 19th century pictures) Instead of, say, a high-toned erotic picture like Venus on the half shell, or a religous madonna, the image of the feminine that he has chosen for his wall is a bourgeois woman metamorphizing herself into a fur bearing animal. Doesn't this show a subconscious predisposition on Gregor's part? Gregor's notion of das ewig weibliche? Or something like that?
Perhaps "The Metamorphosis" was intended to censure the inclination people have to accept the roles expected by society, or apparently necessitated by circumstance. Gregor lies at the center of a complicated web of events, obligations, and authority. His father had been destroyed by the failure of his business, nominally retaining the patriarchal role, while in fact depending upon his son. His mother was an asthmatic woman, bound by her role as wife. Grete was a young woman hoping to attain a desirable status in the music world; she was in fact held by her own and Gregor's aspirations. Gregor himself is bound to his family by the expectations of filial piety, his own connections to his family, and perhaps by his own feelings of inability outside his family. In addition he is controlled by the strange, nearly omniscient authority of the Head Clerk who represents all of the other authoritative positions in Gregor's firm. As much as Gregor felt trapped, no matter the degree to which his family was imprisoned, none of them could abandon their role without negatively affecting the others. Gregor's metamorphosis into the lowliest, most repulsive insect; and his subsequent death, was the only liberation he and his family coud find. His new form frightened authority; precluded his continuing to provide for,(while imprisoning), his family; and leaves Gregor time to find a new appreciation for human things like his sister's playing, and the furnishings in his room. His insect form remains in much the same way as his families ill-will toward him would have remained had he simply left; it also allows the reader to understand that his escape, ultimately through death, was also a new, if painful freedom. Interpreted this way "The Metamorphosis" is an indictment of the tendencies both of society to develop, and individuals to accept, the roles proscribed by circumstance and tradition.
I believe that even though Gregor is providing for his family, he is also preventing them from growing and moving past their bad circumstances. By having his "metamorphosis", Gregor was able to not look at life as a job that needed to be done, but he was able to enjoy some of the simpler things, such as his sister playing the violin for her parents. After Gregor is transformed, and can no longer work and provide for his family, they are forced to get up and do something for themselves. It's ironic that Gregor working and providing financial stability for his family was actually making them worse off then they were. I believe that Gregor had to die in the story, in order for his family to fully move on with their lives. At the end of the novella, it describes the parents looking at their daughter in a new way. They see her, for the first time, as a blossoming young lady, someone who can take care of herself and others.
As much as I want to feel sympathetic for Gregor and his new embodiment, I believe the main focus is meant to be on the family's transformations. The father had transformed from a fat, clumsy man to "holding himself very erect, dressed in a tight-fitting blue uniform with gold buttons -- his usually rumpled white hair was combed flat, with a scrupulously exact, gleaming part." And I agree the power has shifted from Gregor to "Mr. Samsa." Grete's transformation involves going from Gregor's main caretaker to seeing him as a "monster" and "constant torture." She is the first to accept the new Gregor and the first to say "it" needs to go. Toward the end, she is no longer seen as a child but a young woman. Throughout his metamorphosis, Gregor, in my opinion, is not treated properly. He helped his family financially and was planning on sending Grete to music school. He had loved them and treated them with respect. When he needed the help, he was treated like a disgrace to the family. For some reason I do not understand, Kafka made Gregor's death lift a burden off the family. The death of Gregor allowed the family to finally be happy.
Reading this blog I agree with many of the purposed theories that the "students of literature" have provided. I most whole heartily agree with the theory of the novella is meant to be about the family's own transformation. I believe Gregor's metamorphosis was simply a catalyst leading into the main story that, although told in the background and being only in hindsight is what the book is truly focusing on, or meant to tell the reader.
Or a more radical theory of mine, probably because of reading too many science fiction novels is that Gregor was never really there to begin with and was always a cockroach. But he manifested into a giant roach due to the subconscious desires of the family for a way to become what they once were or to achieve a better since of self and accomplishment and "Gregor" was the way the family achieved it. As it stands that theory would make no sense because of the other characters inside the book, unless to the other characters he was just a normal but slightly over large cockroach.
Sticking to my ridiculous theory the giant cockroach that has manifested itself to the family could represent the family's disgust and disappointment towards the outside world that they have to conform to that they so desire.
I have to say that I agree with Warren. I think that in the times you want to pity Gregor for his now pervading situation, you see the way the family has evolved into a nonprosperous group of people. While Gregor was taking great pride in working and completely supporting his family while also paying off their debts, they have all slowly began to slip away, physically and emotionally. His father had become fat and useless and his mother had horrible asthma problems. I think everyone in life has the need to feel like they are loved and that they have accomplished something for themselves. I think that Gregor felt like he was accomplishing his goals but he didn't take into consideration the goals and aspirations that his family members had set for themselves. He had made his own goals for them, like paying off their debts and sending his sister to the Conservatory. I think this is one way that Gregor felt in power without knowing he was hindering his family, instead of helping them. But then I believe that even though he had set these goals for his family, he only wanted what was best for them. He didn't want to see them suffer anymore. He did everything he could to help them but then when the tables were turned and he needed compassion and help, the family referred to him as a "monster". Even though he ended up hindering the family, I don't understand how they could have completely isolated him from being a part of the family after all that he had done for them through the years.
The story focuses mainly on what happened after Gregor's metamorphosis and it seems like no one questions or tries to figure out the cause for his change. I thought the author should have some type of explanation. Considering the transformation, i think it has both good and bad outcomes. The good one is that the parents were not dependent any longer. They did not have any choice but to go out and work which gave them the opportunity to become active and healthy. Even for his sister now she can take care of herself rather than depend on him. However, it is sad that Gregor ended up the way he did. To me he seemed a good son and brother who wanted nothing but support his family. The story talks about how he would hate to get up early in the morning to go to work but do so that way, he can pay off his parents' dept. But he was taken as a burden when he no longer provided for the family.
I think this story shows how people can change when tragedy strikes. Gregors whole family had to transform themselves when he was no longer there in human flesh and blood. His mother and father had stopped working and his father gained weight while Gregor was around because there was no longer any need for them to be productive. Then when the unfortunate metamorphosis took place they were forced to get out and work for the things they needed to live. His father returned to the working Mr. Samsa, his mother also went back to work and his sister quickly grew into a young lady. The metamorphosis was a tragedy for the family, but in the end his father, mother and sister all grew in a positive way from it.
In the begining its kinda ridiculous. How can any human being become an insect in one night? As soon as he figures out he is an insect he think about his job instead of thinking how his life was ruined.It somewhat represents his personal alienation.Metamorphosis symbolizes problems in his family and how the demals placed on him have worn him down.Its kinda parallel with humankind.But still dont get it why he has to convert Gregor to a cockroach to describe all these.
I definitely agree with all of the previous comments that have been made here, though I think that if Kafka had given an explanation for the Metamorphosis, then it may have taken away a certain element from the novella. Not having an explanation seemed to only add to the mysteriousness of the story.
The shifting of power throughout the story seems to follow a flip-flop style pattern. Clearly at some point in time pre-novel, Mr. Samsa had to have worked; this is probably where the debt came from, but as soon as Gregor was of age to start providing for the family, the power changes from the father to the son, while the authority seems to remain stable throughout. Gregor never undermines his father, even when he is the primary bread winner for the family. I do not believe that it was ever Gregor's intentions to keep the family in the so-called "shackles" but that the family rather fell that way to him. You can not bite the hand that feeds you, so therefore the family relies completely and totally on Gregor. I do not agree with the idea that this story was intended to "censure the inclination people have to accept the roles expected by society," solely because the roles are really quite reversed here. The father is generally the primary provider, granted the son may contribute slightly to that, but never completely, fully and independently. After reading the novel for the third time, I find it always intriguing how mysterious and imaginative Kafka really was.
Reading the novella made me think about all the transformations in it. Kafka's shows the transformation of not only Gregor, but the whole family. In the beginning when Gregor is first transformed into a bug, so much sympathy is given to him by the whole family. They show strength and hope as a family. But as the novella progresses, we see the transformation of the family. They no longer recognize the bug as Gregor and as he seems to be getting in the way of the family. That is shown when the mother decides to remove the furniture in his room, as a sign that they have lost hope that the bug would transform back to Gregor. It was ironic how Gregor used to provide for the whole family, but it came down to their time to provide for Gregor, they no longer recognized him as a part of them.
The shifting balance of power where one must step aside to let the other rise is one of the themes in this novella. The initial shift was after the father's business had failed, the family was deep in debt with nowhere to turn but to Gregor. Gregor took it upon himself to provide for the family with such a passion that literally overnight he was promoted from a low-level clerk to traveling salesman. This immediate success was hard on the father and caused him to wither away, gaining a substantial amount of weight. This shift was also hard on the mother as she developed repertory problems during this time. He continued to dominate the family for years, which his power growing from an increasing salary, the family's ailments only worsened. But then, times changed and he became less and less successful at work. He was working just as hard, but seeing no success. It could have been this loss of power that caused him to be transformed into such vermin. With this reversal of roles, it forced the father and mother to clean up their act and take charge of the family. There was such a change in them, that Gregor did not recognize them at first. Gregor continued to lose his grip on power, after his sister no longer took care of him and his furniture was moved, until his realization that he could not lock his sister up in his room and he was no longer wanted by his family. After these psychological blows, Gregor became powerless, withered away and died soon thereafter. With the burden called Gregor out of the picture, the family was finally free to move on and live as they wanted. In the end, we see the daughter blossom into a beautiful young woman, wherein, likely lies the next shift in power.
I'd have to agree with the opinions that have been presented before me especially the ideas that the metamorphosis forced the whole family to change and adapt to the circumstances in which they now had to live by. I think that the title of the novella is absolutely perfect because yeah there is the obvious that Gregor morphs into a cockroach in the beginning, but the rest of the family had to go through "metamorphosis" too. They just didn't go through it in a physical way like Gregor did. The dad had to "morph" back into a working man once Gregor was no longer with them. Grete "morphed" into a young lady that her parents finally realized her talents. These were all of the "metamorphosis'" that took place throughout that I feel the title refers to. I feel Kafka is going for the other changes in people with the title then he's talking about Gregor changing into a cockroach. I think that he's trying to get through to people that you have to change or adapt to your circumstances, because everything doesn't always go smoothly in life sometimes an obstacle is thrown in your way and you have to find a way to rise above it. And I think that is what the family did by accepting him and trying to find a way to move on with life and except what had happened to them and their son or brother. At first though his dad was not too accepting "With a hostile expression his father clenched his fist, as if to drive Gregor back into his room, then looked uncertainly around the living room, shielded his eyes with his hands, and sobbed with heaves of his powerful chest." When I first read that my first thoughts turned to today's society and how things haven't changed too much, because I was thinking about how we usually think of our parents of reacting to our change. Especially if a son was to tell his parents that he was gay the dad would typically thought to react the same way as he did in this story when he "saw" Gregor's change.
Truthfully, it was hard for me to follow the plot to "The Metamorphosis", but the comment made on the blog helped me to understand it a little better. Regarding the statement about Gregor's motives for taking care of his family, I would have to disagree if the implications are that he was intentionally putting them in "shackles". I believe that Gregor was perhaps trying to "win them over" so that he can maintain some social stability in his life. After all, if he was taking care of the bills, his family would be readily available to him because they wouldn't have to work.
Also, I agree with Dr. Lucas' observation that family's dependence on Gregor was a hindrance to their overall will being, but I can't help but sympathize with Gregor because when he needed his family the most they abandoned him.
Post a Comment